Looks like two of George Hansen's initial blog posts amount to swipes at Dean Radin's statistical credibility.
Disputes in academia are nothing new, but thanks to the internet, and the fact that both Radin and Hansen are bloggers, this one has the potential to be a lot more public than many previous dust-ups in parapsychology. . .
UPDATE: Radin has addressed Hansen's critique here. H/T Book Surgeon, in the comments. . .